Morgan “Dick” Tsvangirai is a naive coward!
From the inception of the Temporary Political Agreement of 15 September 2008, Dick has shown his cowardice and naive tendencies repeatedly.
At one time he wrote a letter to all judges and magistrates defending an accused Roy Bennet.This was one of the most glaring blunders he has made.This indeed showed Zimbabweans how naive and uneducated this minister is.Here the state (Dick included) had a case againstBennet accused of possesing mass weapons for purposes of banditry and insurgency and we see our supposed “Prime ” minister (although he is only 4th in the hierarchy after The President and two Vice Presidents) going against his own chief lawyer the Attorne General to scribble a badly written letter instructing the whole judiciary system to ” hands off ” Bennet.
He is the same man who preaches freedom of the Judiciary!
Today Dick is in a predicament with the issue of Bennet.He has announced a soft ” dissengagement” from the Temporary Political Agreement which has been also named the Global Political Agreement by the Movement for Democratic Change.
This so called ” dissengagement” is meaningless as they continue to use state vehicles , offices and funds.This shows how much of a coward this minister , Dick is.He can’t stand up and make a bold statement on weather he is still IN ou OUT of the coalition government.
This cowardice is from the fact that he is playing to the tune of his Western and Ex-Rhodesian paymasters (represented by the indicted Roy ” Pachedu ” Bennet , whose family is notorious fro attrocities commited on Black African s in the Manicaland Area)
Ex-MDC member Gabriel Chaibva has put it on record that Dick Tsvangirai and his corrupt cronies were the authors of the ZDERA sanctions Bill.
Below is an extract from the Zimbabwean HERALD.
http://www.herald.co.zw/inside.aspx?sectid=11876&cat=10
‘Disengagement’ a damp squib
Campion Mereki
EDITOR — When will the MDC-T leadership outgrow the politics of boycotts?
Even the most ardent of the party’s supporters now find it hard to define what the party stands for. I was speaking to an old friend of mine who is an avid MDC-T supporter who confessed his growing disillusionment with Morgan Tsvangirai’s antics.
He told me that he had believed that the MDC-T was nationalistic in outlook but it has since dawned on him that, this was not the case. The party, he says, was showing more and more that it stands for the defence of white interests.
All that Tsvangirai says or does comes from Whitehall with some input from Capitol Hill.
Those who advise Tsvangirai and the party that bears his name are leading them astray. They thought this so-called partial pullout would lead to a ‘‘constitutional crisis’’ but it is business as usual. To the majority, the ‘‘disengagement’’ has been a damp squib.
Zimbabweans are not concerned about the little emotional thoughts of the politically green; they are more concerned about building the economy that the MDC-T leadership helped to destroy by calling for ruinous economic sanctions.
My old friend said his party was a victim of circumstances. The party leaders can’t do anything or decide anything on their own. They claimed that they consulted their supporters about pulling out of the inclusive Government. They said their supporters asked them to stay on. Surprisingly, a few days after ‘‘consulting’’, Tsvangirai announced the ‘‘disengagement’’.
Which constituency asked him to pull out of the inclusive Government? Is it the one he claimed to have consulted nationwide or the staffers seconded to his office by Western embassies?
It is now clear that Tsvangirai only listens to the voices of his handlers in Europe and the United States. His supporters here only matter when it comes to the polls since the British and Americans do not vote.
I hope MDC-T supporters are watching and learning from these sad but hilarious developments.
Campion Mereki.
Harare.
